I’ve been doing research on critical thinking (CT) for almost 20 years, and so I take a lot of things for granted. I have it defined it gave an example shortened its definition, and having done it so many times for so many people, it would be easy for me to assume that most people know what I’m talking about. Fortunately, I do not fall victim to such things “the curse of knowledge”, because I am well aware of the great difficulty researchers and educators have had over the years in defining CT. Relatively recent research suggests a fairly consistent concept among CT researchers, but not necessarily for educators (which remains a major obstacle to efforts to improve CT in young populations).
Misinterpretation of critical thinking
At the same time, I was surprised to see the same misinterpretation happen twice in a matter of weeks recently, because not only is it a key feature of CT, but I have never had this problem happen to me in those nearly 20 years. Maybe I have become the curse of science! Indeed, there is more to understanding CT than its definition. Why do we call him? critical think?
The misinterpretation I heard twice was about its existence critical in terms of “criticism” of thought. This is absolutely, 100 percent not the case. CT result of course it can criticism of some nature, in some situations, but nowhere does it say that it should be. In fact, CT often leads to disagreements, and perhaps even more so because earlier stages of CT have ensured that sources of information are judged as reliable, and therefore critical thinkers generally agree with reliable sources and information. It is worth noting the confusion that we can sometimes see between them KT and critical theorythrough their similar naming, it is possible to focus on “criticism”, which is often the main focus of the latter. No, the reason we call CT critical thinking is twofold.
There are two reasons why this is “critical”.
In the first place (I would argue – perhaps this leaves less room for ambiguity), it is important because Is important. When we think of “critical reasons” for why we should think or believe something, the term “critical” implies that they are important or important, and that ignoring the issue(s) could be fatal. In fact, CT is laborious and time-consuming…compared to other non-targeted forms of thinking. Thus, I suggest that the use of frequent CT should be considered. For example, are you interested in the outcome of thinking about a particular decision? When it comes to something as trivial as ordering coffee at a cafe, using CT is a waste of resources. But if the result is important to you – if the decision is very important – yes, use CT.
The second reason, I admit, is more of a semantic problem, but nevertheless, it can directly affect the heart of the matter. As mentioned above, when I discuss how KT was not named because of criticism or misinterpretation of criticism, it is important to recognize that the historical basis of these words is Greek. criticism. Kritik follows the same etymological tradition as we understand it in terms of KT – it also comes from Greek. criticism However, despite a similar starting point, the meaning has evolved over time through translation, application, and connotation. For example, “criticism” (from the French) and criticism or criticism (the English version of the Latin). critic) refer to error detection with a negative connotation.
On the other hand, the CT version criticism refers to a description that has changed less over the years – the ability to judge, differentiate, make decisions, analyze and evaluate. Indeed, these traditional perspective maps agree well with modern conceptualizations of CT. We analysis and rate it information for us to draw conclusions through reflection judgmentand use it decision what to do or what to believe.
Summary
In summary, we consider CT critical for two main reasons. First, because we recognize the importance of the decision that needs to be made, and secondly, it means the ability to analyze, evaluate and make decisions. decision making. However, KT in no way means that we should criticize or criticize. Of course, critical thinkers are skeptical, but so are they open volunteer; The world view is wide. Being critical in thinking (criticizing) often means that there is something “wrong” or negative, it just seems like a lot. bias– Opposite to CT. So, if your decisions are important, use CT, be objective and don’t forget to analyze and evaluate.
